Analysis: taking things apart
The fact that one cannot tell from any piece of code whether
it is machine-executable or not provides the principle
condition of all E-Mail viruses on the one hand, and of the
codeworks of jodi, antiorp/Netochka Nezvanova, mez, Ted
Warnell, Alan Sondheim, Kenji Siratori -
to name only a few -
on the other; work that, unlike the actual viri, is fictional
in that it aesthetically pretends to be potentially viral
machine code.9
The codeworks, to use a term coined by Alan Sondheim, of
these writers and programmer-artists are prime examples for a
digital poetry which reflects the intrisic textuality of the
computer. But they do so not by being, to quote Alan Turing via
Raymond Queneau, computer poetry to be read by computers10,
but by playing with the
confusions and thresholds of machine language and human
language, and by reflecting the cultural implications of these
overlaps. The ''mezangelle'' poetry of mez/Mary Ann Breeze,
which mixes programming/network protocol code and non-computer
language to a portmanteau-word hybrid, is an outstanding
example of such a poetics.
Compared to earlier poetics of formal instruction, like in
La Monte Young's Composition 1961, in Fluxus pieces
and in permutational poetry, an important difference can be
observed in the codeworks: The Internet code poets and artists
do not construct or synthesize code, but they use code or code
grammars they found and take them apart. I agree with Friedrich
Block and his ''Eight Digits of Digital Poetry''
http://www.dichtung-digital.de/2001/10/17-Block/index-engl.htm
that digital poetry should be read in the history and context
of experimental poetry. A poetics of synthesis was
characteristic of combinatory and instruction-based poetry, a
poetics of analysis characterized Dada and its successors.
But
one hardly finds poetry with an analytical approach to formal
instruction code in the classical 20th century avant-garde.11
Internet code poetry is
being written in a new - if one likes, post-modernist -
condition of machine code abundance and overload.
The hypothesis that there is no such thing as digital media,
but only digital code which can be stored in and put out on any
analog medium, is perfectly verified by codework poetry. Unlike
hypertext and multimedia poets, most of the artists mentioned
here write plain ASCII text. The contradiction between a
complex techno-poetical reflection and low-tech communication
is only a seeming one; quite on the contrary, the low-tech is
crucial to the critical implication of the codework
poetics.
The development of hyperfiction and multimedia poetry
practically paralleled the construction of the World Wide Web;
hyperfiction authors rightfully saw themselves as its pioneers.
In the course of nineties, they continued to push the technical
limits of both the Internet and multimedia computer technology.
But since much digital art and literature became testbed
applications for new browser features and multimedia plugins,
it simultaneously locked itself into non-open,
industry-controlled code formats.12
Whether
intentional or not, digital art thus strongly participated in
the reformatting of the World Wide Web from an open, operating
system- and browser-agnostic information network to a platform
dependent on propietary technology.
By readjusting the reader's attention from software surfaces
which pretended not to be code back to the code itself,
codeworks have apparent aesthetical and political affinities to
hacker cultures. While hacker cultures are far more diverse
than the singular term ''hacker'' suggests13, hackers
could as well be distinguished between those who put things
together -
like Free Software and demo programmers - and those
who take things apart - like crackers of serial numbers and
communication network hackers from YIPL/TAP, Phrack, 2600 and
Chaos Computer Club schools. Code poets have factually adopted
many poetical forms that were originally developed by various
hacker subcultures from the 1970s to the early 1990s, including
ASCII Art, code slang (like ''7331 wAr3z d00d'' for ''leet
[=elite] wares dood'') and poetry in programming languages
(such as Perl poetry), or they even belong to both the
''hacker'' and the ''art'' camp
From its beginning on, conceptualist net.art engaged in a
critical politics of the Internet and its code, and continues
to be closely affiliated with critical discourse on net
politics in such forums as the ''Nettime'' mailing list. In its
aesthetics, poetics and politics, codework poetry departs from
net.art rather than from hyperfiction and its historical roots
in the Brown University literature program.
How does digital code relate to literary text? If one
discusses the poetics of digital code in terms of the poetics
of literary text - instead of discussing literary text in terms
of digital code -, one may consider both of them interrelated
without having to subscribe, as John Cayley suggested in his
abstract to the German ''p0es1s'' conference14, to
Friedrich Kittler's techno-determinist media theory; a theory
which, despite all of its intellectual freshness
seem to fall
into the metaphysical trap Derrida described in
''Écriture et différence'': By replacing one
metaphysicial center (in Kittler's case: ''Geist''/spirit,
''Geistesgeschichte''/intellectual history and
''Geisteswissenschaft''/humanities) with another one -
technology, history of technology and technological discourse
analysis - it writes on metaphysics under a different label,
contrary to its own claim to have rid itself from it.
The subtitle of this text writes an open question: ''Can
notions of text which were developed without electronic texts
in mind be applied to digital code, and how does literature
come into play here?'' For the time being, I would like to
answer this question at best provisionally: While all
literature should teach us to read and deal with the textuality
of computers and digital poetry, computers and digital poetry
might teach us to pay more attention to codes and control
structures coded into all language. In more general terms,
program code contaminates in itself two concepts which are
traditionally juxtaposed and unresolved in modern linguistics:
the structure, as conceived of in formalism and structuralism,
and the performative, as developed by speech act theory.
References
- Lawrence Lessig. Code and Other Laws of
Cyberspace. Basic Books, New York, 2000.
- Harry Mathews and Alastair Brotchie, editors. Oulipo
Compendium. Atlas Press, London, 1998.
- Raymond Queneau. Cent mille milliards de
poèmes. Gallimard, Paris, 1961.
- Galerie und Edition Hundertmark. George Maciunas und
Fluxus-Editionen, 1990.
|